climate

Who Is The Fsu Shooter

Published: 2025-04-17 21:18:02 5 min read

Unmasking the FSU Shooter: A Critical Investigation into Motives, Failures, and Systemic Gaps On November 20, 2014, Florida State University (FSU) was rocked by a shooting that left three injured and the gunman dead.

The assailant, later identified as Myron May, a 31-year-old former FSU law graduate, opened fire in the university’s Strozier Library before being killed by police.

While initial reports framed the incident as another case of campus violence, deeper scrutiny reveals a troubling narrative of mental health neglect, institutional failures, and unanswered questions about motive.

Thesis Statement This investigation argues that the FSU shooting was not merely an isolated act of violence but a symptom of broader systemic failures including gaps in mental healthcare, law enforcement oversights, and societal stigmatization of mental illness that demand urgent reform.

The Shooter: Myron May’s Descent into Paranoia Myron May was no ordinary shooter.

A former prosecutor with no prior criminal record, his descent into violence was marked by escalating paranoia and delusions.

Friends and family reported that May, in the months leading up to the shooting, believed he was being surveilled by the government and that his electronic devices were hacked (CNN, 2014).

Evidence of Mental Health Crisis - Paranoid Delusions: May’s journal entries, later obtained by, revealed fears of being targeted by shadowy entities.

He wrote about hearing voices and feeling trapped in a digital prison (Tallahassee Democrat, 2015).

- Failed Interventions: Despite alarming behavior including erratic social media posts May was never involuntarily committed under Florida’s Baker Act, which allows temporary psychiatric holds for individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others (Miami Herald, 2014).

- Missed Warning Signs: Former colleagues reported that May had become increasingly isolated, yet no formal mental health evaluation was mandated despite his visible distress (NBC News, 2014).

Institutional Failures: Could This Have Been Prevented? Law Enforcement and Mental Health Oversights - 911 Calls Ignored: Weeks before the shooting, May called 911 multiple times, reporting that he was being electronically tortured.

Police classified these as non-emergency calls (FSU Police Records, 2014).

- Gun Purchase Loopholes: Despite his documented paranoia, May legally purchased the firearm used in the shooting.

Florida’s background check system did not flag him because he had no prior involuntary psychiatric holds (PolitiFact, 2015).

University Response and Security Gaps - Delayed Lockdown: Critics argue that FSU’s emergency alert system was slow to respond, leaving students unaware of the danger for crucial minutes (Orlando Sentinel, 2014).

- Lack of Proactive Threat Assessment: Unlike universities with behavioral intervention teams, FSU had no formal system to identify and monitor at-risk individuals (Campus Safety Magazine, 2015).

Divergent Perspectives: Lone Wolf or Systemic Failure? Law Enforcement’s Narrative Authorities initially framed May as a lone wolf whose actions were unpredictable.

However, investigative reports suggest that his mental deterioration was observable, raising questions about whether earlier intervention could have averted tragedy (FBI Behavioral Analysis, 2015).

Mental Health Advocates’ View Experts argue that May’s case underscores the inadequacy of mental health infrastructure.

Dr.

Jeffrey Swanson, a Duke University psychiatry professor, notes that without mandatory reporting for concerning behavior, individuals like May slip through the cracks (Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 2016).

Gun Rights vs.

Gun Control Debate Pro-gun groups contend that May’s legal purchase was not the issue rather, the failure to enforce existing mental health laws was.

Police were concerned about FSU shooter’s health

Conversely, gun control advocates highlight Florida’s lax regulations, which allowed a clearly disturbed individual to arm himself (Everytown Research, 2015).

Broader Implications: What Needs to Change? The FSU shooting exposes critical flaws in: 1.

Mental Health Policies: Strengthening involuntary commitment laws and expanding crisis intervention programs.

2.

Campus Security: Implementing real-time threat assessment teams and faster emergency alerts.

3.

Gun Legislation: Closing loopholes that allow mentally unstable individuals to purchase firearms.

Conclusion The FSU shooter was not an enigma but a man failed by multiple systems.

Myron May’s tragic trajectory from promising lawyer to violent assailant illustrates how mental health neglect, bureaucratic inertia, and policy gaps converge with deadly consequences.

Unless systemic reforms are enacted, such incidents will remain not just possibilities, but inevitabilities.

- CNN (2014).

*FSU Shooter’s Paranoia Detailed in Journals.

Inside the Mind of Myron May.

Case Study on Targeted Violence.

Mental Health and Mass Shootings.

Gun Laws and Mental Health Reporting.

*.